Table of contentsAndrews binding energy: Can it be revisited? Andrew’s Beer Energy Drug Discovery Is a Multiple Response Surface The Screening Attrition Rate The Traditional Lead Discovery Strategy What We Know About Drug-Receptor Interactions Enter the (Australian) Dragon Observing Ligand-Receptor Interactions ABE-type Counts in PDR Some shortcuts WOMBASE (WOrld of Molecules with Biological Activities databaSE) WOMBASE Description WOMBASE Quality Control Tested activity profile for SADB5 (21700 compounds) Warning! Friends of Dracula Are Meeting at an Undisclosed Location SPF 200 The Mis-Use of RO5 Scores Common Sources for Leads in Drug Discovery Summary: Leads, Drugs, MDDR & SADB5 Increased MW does not warrant higher activity Increased LogP does not warrant higher activity Increased complexity does not warrant better activity Slide 23 pKi Distribution (3565 actives , ABE Set) MW Distribution (3565 actives, ABE Set) LogP Distribution (3565 actives , ABE Set) LogSw Distribution (3565 actives , ABE Set) Conformational Flexibility in Transylvanian Interactions Side Effects During Transylvanian Interactions (1) Side Effects During Transylvanian Interactions (2) ABE vs. MW (3565 actives) How Small Can Active Compounds Be? ABE vs. pKi (3565 actives) Slide 34 OBE vs. MW (3565 actives) Just How Stable is ABE? pKi at High MW (471 actives) Slide 38 Revisiting the (Australian) Dragon ABE in OEChem [thanks to the Hive Mind] Can ABE be Revisited? Revisited ABE vs. pKi (442 actives) PowerPoint Presentation Acknowledgments Slide 45 |