Title: Charting Biologically Relevant Chemical Space: A Structural Classification of Natural Products (SCONP) Author: Wetzel, S., Dortmund/D, Ertl, P., Basel/CH, Schuffenhauer, A., Basel/CH, Waldmann, H., Dormund/D Prof. Dr. Herbert Waldmann, Max-Planck-Institute for Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Straße 11, 44227 Dortmund and University of Dortmund Abstract: Combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening evolved as powerful tools in drug discovery. But initial expectations that large libraries would yield more hits and leads were not fulfilled and it has been realized that the biological relevance, design, and diversity of the library are more important. Thus libraries based on biologically relevant structures, e.g. natural products, can be expected to yield more and possibly better modulators than others.[1] This immediately raises a key question: where to find biologically validated starting points for library design in chemical structure space? "Space", as Douglas Adams famously said "is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is."[2] Unknowingly, he thus prophesied one of the great obstacles in charting chemical space. Although natural product space is just a comparably small subset of chemical structure space, it is highly diverse not only in structure but also in biological activity. Therefore, initial reduction of the structural diversity is a key step for any attempt to map natural product space. In our work we developed an abstracting chemoinformatic approach to chart natural product space. Since chemical structures are part of the international chemical language, we decided to do a structure based classification. As shown in the figure below, we first extracted the scaffolds from the natural products and then arranged these in a tree-like fashion according to substructure relationships.[3]
[1] R. Breinbauer, I. R. Vetter, H. Waldmann, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 3002-3015; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2878-2890. [2] D. Adams, Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy, Del Rey, Reissue Edition 1995. [3] M. A. Koch, A. Schuffenhauer, M. Scheck, S. Wetzel, M. Casaulta, A. Odermatt, P. Ertl, and H. Waldmann, PNAS 2005, 102, 17272-17277.