Bibliography

1
Jonas Boström, ``Reproducing the Conformations of Protein-Bound Ligands: A Critical Evaluation of Several Popular Conformational Searching Tools'', Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design (JCAMD), Vol. 15, pp. 1137, 2002.

2
J. Boström, J. R. Greenwood, and J. Gottfries, ``Assessing the Performance of OMEGA with Respect to Retrieving Bioactive Conformations'', Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modeling, Vol. 21, pp. 449-462, 2003.

3
Mongoose

4
Wizard

5
J. Gasteiger, C. Rudolph and J. Sadowski, ``Automatic Generation of 3D Atomic Coordinates for Organic Molecules'', Tetrahedron Comp. Method., Vol 3., pp. 537-547, 1990.

6
J. Sadowski and J. Gasteiger, ``From Atoms and Bonds to Three-dimensional Atomic Coordinates: Automatic Model Builders'', Chemical Reviews, Vol. 93, pp. 2567-2581, 1993.

7
J. Sadowski, J. Gasteiger and G. Klebe, ``Comparison of Automatic Three-dimensional Model Builders using 639 X-Ray Structures'', Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science (JCICS), Vol. 34, pp. 1000-1008, 1994.

8
Concord

9
David C. Spellmeyer, A.K. Wong, M.J. Bower and J.M. Blaney, ``Conformational Analysis using Distance Geometry Methods'', Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modeling, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 18-36 1997.

10
Matthew T. Stahl, ``Rapid 3D Database Searching'', IIR: Computational Drug Design, circa 2000.

11
Matthew T. Stahl, ``You want conformers? I'll give you conformers!'', 2nd Annual OpenEye Customers, Users, and Programmers Meeting, March 2001.

12
J. Andrew Grant, Anthony Nicholls, A. Geoffrey Skillman, and Matthew T. Stahl, ``Dude, where are my conformers?'', 222nd National ACS Meeting, August 25th, 2001.

13
Matthew T. Stahl, ``Omega, AESOP, and other cautionary tales of naming programs.'', 3rd Annual OpenEye Customers, Users, and Programmers Meeting, March 2002.

14
T.A. Halgren, ``Merck Molecular Force Field: I. Basis, Form, Scope, Parameterization and Performance of MMFF94'', Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 490-519, 1996.

15
T.A. Halgren, ``Merck Molecular Force Field: II. MMFF94 van der Waals and Electrostatic Parameters for Intermolecular Interactions'', Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 520-552, 1996.

16
T.A. Halgren, ``Merck Molecular Force Field: III. Molecular Geometries and Vibrational Frequencies'', Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 553-586, 1996.

17
T.A. Halgren and R.B. Nachbar, ``Merck Molecular Force Field: IV. Conformational Energies amd Geometries for MMFF94'', Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 687-615, 1996.

18
T.A. Halgren, ``Merck Molecular Force Field: V. Extension of MMFF94 using Experimental Data, Additional Computational Data and Empirical Rules'', Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 616-641, 1996.

19
T.A. Halgren, ``MMFF VI. MMFF94s Option for Energy Minimization Studies'', Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 20, pp. 720-729, 1999.

20
T.A. Halgren, ``MMFF VII. Characterization of MMFF94, MMFF94s and Other Widely Available Force Fields for Conformational Energies and for Intermolecular Interaction Energies and Geometries'', Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 20, pp. 730-748, 1999.

21
M. Sykes, B. Pickup, J.A. Grant, ``The Sheffield Solvation Model'', In preparation.